Clearly written terms, rules & regulations for an efficient and cost-effective arbitration process Click image. envelope

last update : February 2010 ( subject to change without notice )

PART A - General

Article 1 - Settlement agreement, general conditions and regulations

  1. Disputes between parties will solely be resolved by e-Court in compliance with its regulations and general conditions. This takes place in accordance with either the common law and/or the civil-law tradition whereby parties jointly instruct a third party to make a ruling on their behalf. The third party shall be e-Court.
  2. Parties whilst providing irrevocable authority to e-Court in its position as third party also instruct
    e-Court to confirm its decision when determining a dispute and/or uncertainty in a registered & enforeceable deed where applicable and a registered deed for application in other regions.
  3. The general conditions and rules of e-Court are fully applicable to any dispute litigation through e-Court and the resulting legal relationship between all stakeholders. They are considered part of the settlement agreement between parties.

Article 2 - End of authority of government court judge

  1. Where a party(ies) submit(s) a conflict to e-Court, that party(ies) automatically end(s) its support to the authority by any other body. The parties therefore agree to each other and with e-Court they have no longer an interest to settle their conflict and/or uncertainty through another outside body.
  2. Parties choose explicitly to litigate through an expert legal e-Court judge, within a well defined process and with a possibility of an appeal, as such the procedure ends in a decision by the e-Court judge. Each party expressly disclaims against the other party any further action to review the e-Court decision by the judge outside e-Court.

Article 3 - Scope of e-Court judge authority; decision in absentia

  1. e-Court has jurisdiction to deal with eligible common & civil cases under the common law and/or the civil-law traditions in Canada. If a case by a lawyer ( "counsel") of one party is presented to e-Court, the conflict is considered eligible for litigation through e-Court. E-Court, in that case will broadly interpret its authority and follow the understanding by the submitting counsel. However e-Court has all times the right to decline its jurisdiction and subsequent litigation.
  2. e-Court will decline jurisdiction in criminal, administrative & destructive Board decisions, bankruptcy, certain family law issues (such as; name changes, paternity declarations and the like) as well as other jurisdictions reserved to government law jurisdiction.
  3. If parties consent to litigate solely through e-Court, but either party wish not to give evidence through its submitted dossier(s) and/or either party clearly wish not to cooperate ( e.g not showing up in a appeal hearing ) during the e-Court process, then the e-Court judge can declare an absentia decision. Further info ..........READ ON


Copyright 2010|Privacy|Mobile  **|Facebook **|Linkedin **|Twitter ** | Blog **|YouTube  **
Also in UK, CAN, USA, IN, AU soon NL, BE, HK, IM, RU, CN, JP, NZ, IE, IT, DE, FR, CH, ES, GR, AT, SE, SG
ADRpartners and eCourt.pro and eCourt.im and iCourt.im


All related domains are the property of e-Court.ca Legal Services International Inc.